Talk:Caressing (horse)

Requested move 28 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn by nominator Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

---

Caressing (horse) → Caressing – There is zero mention of caressing, on the Haptic communication page. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose, no evidence shown that the horse is the primary topic. Perhaps the primary redirect can be retargeted to Physical intimacy, as Caress currently does. 162 etc. (talk) 22:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per the principle of least astonishment, one would expect caressing to go to an article about the act of caressing, not to a horse. Also a better redirect target for caressing is physical intimacy for consistency reasons. JIP | Talk 23:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose. This is not any evidence that the horse is the primary target. I agree the redirect should go to the Physical intimacy article instead. I also agree with the principle of least astonishment. If I was typing this into the search bar, I would expect an article on the act of caressing (or information about it) and not an article about a horse with that name. Aoba47 (talk) 00:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.